This
bothered me, because I don't normally get into arguments that nasty. Before it was all over, I had been called unpatriotic, a weakling,
and a budding Nazi. But it what really got my dander up was being
called irrational. I may not always be rational, but I try hard to
be, and spend a downright unhealthy amount of time thinking about
what rationality is...and what it isn't. That's what the argument
made me think about, and what I want to think about in my next few
posts. But first, a little more about the Rumble on Sesame Street. I
won't get too detailed, because there's nothing more boring
than hearing someone tell you, “So then I just said to him, I
said....blah, blah, blah...” But I spend a lot of time on this
blog talking about civility and rationality, and this argument was a
spectacular breakdown of both, so it's worth looking at what went
wrong. (Just to be clear, I'm not saying everyone who doesn't support government subsidies for PBS is like the guy I'm describing here. Some of them are very smart and nice, and I can disagree with them without getting into a fight).
Here's
how it started. I'm one of the PBS lovers, so as soon as the debate
was over, I started thinking up ways to show people that federal
spending on PBS is actually quite minuscule compared to the entire
federal budget. I had soon worked out that if you imagined federal
spending this year in terms of height—the height of the Empire
State Building, which is 1445 feet tall—then federal spending on
PBS would amount to a little more than a tenth of an inch. I was rather proud of this image, so, when I saw a comment thread about
PBS, I threw it in there.